接着上一篇:干货推荐:稳定进近的误解与误读(1)
今天继续学习FSF(国际飞安基金会)的研究报告:
(不想看英文的往下翻,有翻译)
Factors in Unstabilized Approaches
Unstabilized approaches are attributed to:
• Fatigue;
• Pressure of flight schedule (making up for delays);
• Any crew-induced or ATC-induced circumstances resulting in insufficient time to plan, prepare and conduct a safe approach. This includes accepting requests from ATC to fly higher/faster or to fly shorter routings than desired;
• ATC instructions that result in flying too high/too fast during the initial approach;
• Excessive altitude or excessive airspeed (e.g., inadequate energy management) early in the approach;
• Late runway change (lack of ATC awareness of the time required by the flight crew to reconfigure the aircraft for a new approach);
• Excessive head-down work (e.g., flight management system [FMS] reprogramming);
• Short outbound leg or short downwind leg (e.g., because of traffic in the area);
• Late takeover from automation (e.g., because the autopilot [AP] fails to capture the glideslope);
• Premature descent or late descent caused by failure to positively identify the final approach fix (FAF);
• Inadequate awareness of wind conditions, including:
– Tail-wind component;
– Low-altitude wind shear;
– Local wind gradient and turbulence (because of terrain or buildings); or,
– Recent weather along the final approach path (e.g., wind shift or downdrafts caused by a descending cold air mass following a rain shower);
• Incorrect anticipation of aircraft deceleration characteristics in level flight or on a three-degree glide path;
• Failure to recognize deviations or failure to adhere to the excessive-parameter-deviation limits;
• Belief that the aircraft will be stabilized at the minimum stabilization height or shortly thereafter;
• Excessive confidence by the PNF that the pilot flying (PF) will achieve a timely stabilization;
• PF-PNF too reliant on each other to call excessive deviations or to call for a go-around; and,
• Visual illusions.
造成不稳定进近的原因:
不稳定进近归因于:
-
疲劳;
-
航班正点的压力(弥补延误);
-
任何机组或ATC引起的导致没有足够的时间来计划、准备和实施安全的进近的情况。这包括接受来自ATC的要求高高度/大速度或切入比预计更短的航线;
-
ATC指令在起始进近航段导致飞得太高/太快;
-
开始进近时,高度过高或速度过大(例如,没做好能量管理);
-
更改跑道时机太晚(ATC缺乏对于机组人员为重新准备进近所需的时间的意识);
-
过多的低头工作(例如,飞行管理系统FMS重新准备);
-
出航边太短或三边太短(例如,由于飞机太多);
-
手动接管过晚(例如,因为自动驾驶仪未能截获下滑道);
-
未能确定最终进近定位(FAF)导致的过早下降或晚下降;
-
对风的影响认识不足,包括:
- 顺风分量;
- 低空风切变;
- 当地的风的梯度和湍流(由于地形或建筑物);或者,
- 沿最后进近路径的最近天气影响(例如,由阵雨后的下沉冷气团引起的风的变化或下洗气流)。
-
在平飞或三度下滑路径上对飞机减速特性的预计不正确;
-
未能识别偏差或未能遵守超出参数偏差的限制;
-
相信飞机将会在最低稳定高度或此后不久建立稳定进近;
-
PNF过度信任PF将可以按时建立稳定进近;
-
PF-PNF对彼此之间会进行的偏差过度或复飞的提醒过于依赖;
-
视觉错觉。
以上基于FSF(国际飞安基金)的ALAR(进近和着陆事故降低)研究文献,供大家学习!
感谢飞行圈麦机长协助翻译校对
0
推荐